Posts tagged ‘religion’

Friends of Charles Darwin banned in Turkey?

This site is, presumably, currently unavailable in Turkey—to children, at least:

Bianet: Darwin Sites Banned – Survival of the Fittest?
Access is being denied to all internet sites related to evolution as the result of the children profile of the internet filtering system implemented by the Council of Information Technology and Communications (BTK). The latest restriction on internet access caused uproar among internet users.

The “Secure Internet” filtering system was applied on 22 November. Its children profile bans the entire number of websites concerned with the theory of evolution and British naturalist Charles Darwin. This comprises all sites that contain the words “evolution” or “Darwin”.

Come on, chaps. If you really want to join the EU, you’re going to have to stop doing stuff like this!

Darwin has a go at the Catholic church

Freedom of thought will best be promoted by that gradual enlightening of the human understanding which follows the progress of science. I have therefore always avoided writing about religion and have confined myself to science.
Charles Darwin, 1880
The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin (F. Darwin, Ed.)

(…but see comments below!)

Although Darwin undoubtedly did avoid writing about the thorny, old subject of religion, he did occasionally make passing comment on the subject, such as in this passage from The Voyage of the Beagle:

A strong desire is always felt to ascertain whether any human being has previously visited an unfrequented spot. A bit of wood with a nail in it, is picked up and studied as if it were covered with hieroglyphics. Possessed with this feeling, I was much interested by finding, on a wild part of the coast, a bed made of grass beneath a ledge of rock. Close by it there had been a fire, and the man had used an axe. The fire, bed, and situation showed the dexterity of an Indian; but he could scarcely have been an Indian, for the race is in this part extinct, owing to the Catholic desire of making at one blow Christians and Slaves.

In their book Darwin’s Sacred Cause, Desmond and Moore claim, with more than a little supporting evidence, that Darwin’s abhorrence of slavery heavily influenced his scientific thinking. It was certainly a subject very close to his heart—which perhaps goes some way to explaining his uncharacteristic dig at religion in the above passage.

Misleading chart

I don’t intend to make a habit of posting links to my other website here, but yesterday I wrote a post which might be of interest to science/statistics groupies. In it, I have a bit of a rant about a chart presented on the BBC website, which gives a misleadingly high impression of church membership in the UK and Ireland. The post is entitled Thou shalt not bear false witness.

The brachiopods do not lie!

There is none so blind as those who will not see, but those who are absolutely determined to see something will often do so, even when it’s not there. Psychologists call it confirmation bias, and it manifests itself in almost any situation in which one truly wants to believe something: canals on Mars; the blatant off-sidedness of the goal against your team; the utter adorability of your children; the latest ‘evidence’ in support of your favourite conspiracy theory. If you’re after evidence to bolster your existing beliefs, seek and ye shall almost certainly find!

Of course, the classic example of confirmation bias is the countless sightings of the Virgin Mary in pieces of toast, cappuccino foam, wood grain, and just about every other bizarre location you might care to mention. If such manifestations are indeed the Lord’s work, then He really does move in mysterious ways. In reality, these ‘sightings’ are nothing more than vague, coincidental likenesses blown out of all proportion by people who have a very particular way of looking at the world.

In fairness to those who think they see the Virgin Mary in the stains on their bathroom wallpaper, the human mind is very much programmed to recognise facial features, so it’s hardly surprising that we occasionally see faces when they’re not really there. The British comedian Dave Gorman has an excellent set of photographs of ‘faces’ he has spotted in inanimate objects. There is also a Flickr Grilled Cheese Virgin photo pool.

Even us hoary, old sceptics aren’t immune from recognising human faces where they are clearly not. In my own case, I have never spotted the Virgin Mary—well, OK, there was that one time in that pub in Wales—but, last month in Cambridge, I did clearly discern the face of none other than Charles Darwin in a cluster of brachiopods in the Sedgwick Museum:

Brachiopod fossils, Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge
The image of Darwin in some brachiopods recently

What do you mean you don’t see it? And you have the cheek to call yourself a Darwin groupie! The brachiopods do not lie!

It’s the dawn of a new era!

God endorses Darwin!

It was like something out of The Blues Brothers (my all-time favourite film, incidentally). The London Natural History Museum yesterday afternoon:

Darwin bathed in light, the Great Hall, Natural History Museum
Cue the celestial music! Statue of Charles Darwin, bathed in heavenly light!

If I’m totally wrong, and there really is someone up there, He’s probably trying to tell us something…

Looks as if God endorses Darwin!

Harry the ex-faith Baptist

I tend to avoid god-botherer baiting on this website. Life’s too short, and all that. But I was just looking through some old photos, and came across this shot which I hope even the most devoutly deluded of religious fundamentalists will find amusing:

Harry the ex-faith Baptist
Harry the ex-faith Baptist, Sydney, Australia, 2000.

Harry was a former Baptist who felt very disillusioned that Jesus had not returned as foretold in January that year. As soon as I saw him, I knew I had to photograph him. So, for the first (and, so far, only) time in my life, I went up to a complete stranger and asked to take their photograph.

As he posed for the shot, Harry explained how the non-second-coming of Jesus at the turn of the millennium had quite destroyed his faith. He was now preaching the word of Newton and Einstein—two blokes who knew what they were talking about.

“What about Darwin?” I asked.

“Him too!” said Harry.

(I didn’t point out that, to be pedantic, the new millennium wasn’t actually due to start until January 2001.)

Postscript: Is it just my imagination, or does Harry bear an uncanny resemblance to PZ Myers, FCD? We have a right to know.

Dawkins rips Humphrys apart

I caught Richard Dawkins ripping the BBC’s toughest and rudest interviewer apart on Radio 4 this morning. It was great radio. He berrated Jon Humphrys for going too easy on religious interviewees. Towards the end of the three-minute interview, Humphrys (himself an atheist, I believe) clearly realised he didn’t have a leg to stand on. You can listen to the interview in horrible RealPlayer format for the next seven days here.

The interview arose as a result of recent comments made by Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, the UK’s top Roman Catholic, which lunartalks has commented on.

Curious factoid: Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor is a friend of a friend of a friend of mine. I wonder if he knows Kevin Bacon.

Here’s a sentence I don’t get to use very often…

I’m with the Vatican on this one:

BBC: Vatican recants with a statue of Galileo

Four hundred years after it put Galileo on trial for heresy the Vatican is to complete its rehabilitation of the great scientist by erecting a statue of him inside the Vatican walls.

The planned statue is to stand in the Vatican gardens near the apartment in which Galileo was incarcerated while awaiting trial in 1633 for advocating heliocentrism, the Copernican doctrine that the Earth revolves around the Sun.

Nicola Cabibbo, head of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences and a nuclear physicist, said: “The Church wants to close the Galileo affair and reach a definitive understanding not only of his great legacy but also of the relationship between science and faith.”

Pharyngula says it’s too little, too late, too cheesy, and Civil Commotion describes it as chutzpah (whatever that means), but, to me, it sounds like a genuine attempt to draw a line under the whole Galileo business and acknowledge, straight cough, that they were wrong. If that is indeed the case, kudos to them (whatever that means too).

And, on his rare, conciliatory occasion with the Roman Catholic church, why don’t I go the whole hog and disagree with

Ooo! That turned out better than expected!

As it’s Sunday, how about a dollop of biblical literalism?

King James Bible: Genesis I (v. 3–4)

And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. And God saw the light, that it was good…

In other words, God created light and only realised after the event that it was good.

So much for ‘Intelligent Design’!

Intelligent cataloguing

As I report in more detail on my other weblog, while I was in the Liverpool branch of Waterstone’s bookshop last Thursday, I took it upon myself to move Michael Behe‘s creationist book Darwin’s Black Box out of the science section and to place it in the religion and spirituality section where it rightly belongs.

It turns out I am not the first to do this.

An interesting example of convergent evolution, perhaps.

The right kinds of relics

BBC: Joan of Arc remains ‘are fakes’

Bones thought to be the holy remains of 15th Century French heroine Joan of Arc were in fact made from an Egyptian mummy and a cat, research has revealed.

Another victory for science over religious dogma, we might think, but we shouldn’t smirk: remember Piltdown Man? OK, I know the debunking of Piltdown Man was also a victory for science, which is supposed to continually challenge its own theories and data, but egg was definitely left on certain faces.

I don’t get it with bodily relics, I really don’t. Fascinated though I am by Charles Darwin, if someone were to offer me a peek at his skull buried beneath the flagstones of Westminster Abbey (assuming it hasn’t crumbled to dust by now), I would politely decline. Let the poor man rest in peace! And as for Einstein’s brain, sliced, diced and pickled in assorted jars, no thank you very much. It’s damn morbid.

While there’s an outside possibility that an analysis of Darwin’s remains might give us some clue as to the mysterious illness that plagued his life following the Beagle voyage, and Einstein’s brain has supposedly been used for scientific research into the nature of genius, I simply don’t get the (usually, but not exclusively, religious) fascination with preserving and worshipping bodily fragments from the great and the good.

Galileo's finger
Galileo’s finger
IMSS, Florence

Last month, I visited Florence, Italy, where I encountered a genuine, scientific ‘holy’ relic. In a glass case in the frankly wonderful Museum of the History of Science, I gazed upon the middle finger of the right hand of Galileo Galilei. The finger the great scientist raised metaphorically at his former ally Pope Urban VIII while rather patronisingly pointing out the weaknesses of the church’s geocentric view of the universe.

Memorial to Galileo, Sanata Croce, Florence
Galileo’s memorial,
Santa Croce.
(cc) Richard Carter

There is, of course, quite a story behind how Galileo’s finger came to be preserved in a museum in Florence:

When the heretic Galileo died in 1642, the Roman Catholic church could not bring itself to let his remains be buried in consecrated ground. Ninety-five years later, however, the church relented, and his remains were exhumed, relocated to the church of Santa Croce in Florence, and placed inside an impressive marble memorial, directly opposite a similar memorial to Michelangelo (another local who had his fair share of run-ins with the pope).

During the exhumation of Galileo’s remains, on 12th March, 1737, the antiquary Anton Francesco Gori removed the middle finger of Galileo’s right hand. The finger was later placed it inside a glass cup and set upon an alabaster plinth bearing a verse by Tommaso Perelli, which translates from the original Latin as follows:

This is the finger, belonging to the illustrious hand
That ran through the skies,
Pointing at the immense spaces, and singling out new stars,
Offering to the senses a marvellous apparatus
Of crafted glass,
And with wise daring they could
Reach where neither Enceladus nor Tiphaeus ever reached

That’s antiquaries for you, I guess.

Galileo's lens
Galileo’s lens
IMSS, Florence

But sitting right next to Galileo’s finger in the museum display case was a proper scientific relic—an artefact far more important and moving than a few desiccated carpal bones: the actual piece of crafted glass referred to in Perelli’s poem; the original objective lens from the telescope Galileo used to discover the first four satellites of Jupiter, thereby proving beyond doubt to any reasonable person that not all heavenly bodies orbit the Earth.

The sights Galileo saw through that small piece of glass shook the world.

And then, in the next room, there they were: a couple of Galileo’s original telescopes. Holy crap!

Galileo’s lenses and telescopes are surely the right kinds of scientific relics to gawp at in awe; not some pseudo-religious bone fragments.

See also some of my holiday snaps:

The Easter Bunny

Early this morning, I stepped out into my garden with a mug of tea to admire the view in the unseasonally glorious Easter Sunday weather. I was about to return to the house when I spotted a brown hare (Lepus europaeus) in the adjacent field. I have seen hares on the moors above my house many times, but this was a new one as far as species spotted from my garden was concerned. A good start to the day.

Hare watercolour by Albrecht Durer
Hare watercolour by Albrecht Durer, 1502

“An Easter Bunny,” joked my partner, Jen, when I told her about the hare.

Which got me wondering what on earth the Easter Bunny was all about. It wasn’t something I remembered from my childhood. Some silly, new-fangled American ‘tradition’ like trick or treat and pumpkins at Halloween, I thought. I couldn’t have been more wrong:

It turns out that the impressive fecundity of hares (they breed like rabbits), and their famous courtship boxing in early spring, meant they were associated with the Anglo-Saxon goddess of spring, Eostre, whose name and festival was appropriated by the Christians and evolved into Easter. Some European countries still associate Easter with hares and not rabbits.

So Jen was right: I had seen a genuine Easter Bunny.

Link: The British Brown Hare Preservation Society

Darwin at the Vatican

Well, in St Peter’s Basilica, to be precise—but close enough.

I’ve already written about this on my other website, but, on reflection, it really belongs here. For a brief moment on my visit to St Peter’s Basilica the other week, I was amazed to see a sculpture on none other than Charles Darwin, supported by a brace of cherubs.

On closer inspection, it turned out to be former pope and current saint Dionysius (???—268):

Pope/Saint Dionysius
St Dionysius
Darwin
Darwin

Uncanny is what I call it.

See also: More of my photos from Vatican City.

When the infallible embraces the unfalsifiable

I promised myself I wasn’t going to waste any time getting embroiled in the evolution v creationism non-debate on this website, but…

Guardian: Pope prepares to embrace theory of intelligent design

Philosophers, scientists and other intellectuals close to Pope Benedict will gather at his summer palace outside Rome this week for intensive discussions that could herald a fundamental shift in the Vatican’s view of evolution.

There have been growing signs the Pope is considering aligning his church more closely with the theory of “intelligent design” taught in some US states. Advocates of the theory argue that some features of the universe and nature are so complex that they must have been designed by a higher intelligence. Critics say it is a disguise for creationism.

Just for the record, what a total tosser!

For more insightful comment and analysis, why not subscribe to the Red Notebook RSS feed?