<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Red Notebook &#187; creationism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/tag/creationism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com</link>
	<description>The Friends of Charles Darwin blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:41:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Positive spin</title>
		<link>http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2009/02/20090201/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2009/02/20090201/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Carter FCD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2009/02/01/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[78% of Britons reject creationism!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>Guardian:</strong> <a title="Read the full article" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/feb/01/evolution-darwin-survey-creationism">Half of Britons reject evolution, survey finds</a></p>
<div>Half of British adults do not believe in evolution, with at least 22% preferring the theories of creationism or intelligent design to explain how the world came about, according to a survey.</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Very depressing in the land that gave the world Charles Darwin. It speaks volumes about our education system and, as far as I&#8217;m concerned, the general dumbing-down of science in the media. It&#8217;s a good job that scientific truth isn&#8217;t subject to the popular vote.</p>
<p>Looking on the bright side (<a title="Wikipedia: Brights Movement" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brights_movement">no pun intended</a>), however, perhaps the Guardian&#8217;s headline could have had a slightly more positive spin:</p>
<blockquote>
<div>78% of Britons reject creationism, survey finds</div>
</blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s still a depressingly small number, but it should at least knock some of the wind out of creationists&#8217; sails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2009/02/20090201/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ooo! That turned out better than expected!</title>
		<link>http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2007/10/20071021/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2007/10/20071021/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Carter FCD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2007/10/21/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[God didn't realise light was going to be good shock!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As it&#8217;s Sunday, how about a dollop of biblical literalism?</p>
<blockquote class="cite"><p><strong>King James Bible:</strong> <a title="Online edition of King James Bible (Genesis I)" href="http://kingjbible.com/genesis/1.htm">Genesis I</a> (v. 3–4)</p>
<p>And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. And God saw the light, that it was good…</p></blockquote>
<p>In other words, God created light and <em>only realised after the event</em> that it was good.</p>
<p>So much for &#8216;Intelligent Design&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2007/10/20071021/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligent cataloguing</title>
		<link>http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2007/09/20070909/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2007/09/20070909/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Carter FCD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2007/09/09/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In which I move Behe into the religion section.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I report in more detail <a title="Gruts, 08-Sep-2007" href="http://www.gruts.com/archive/2007/09/08/">on my other weblog</a>, while I was in the Liverpool branch of Waterstone&#8217;s bookshop last Thursday, I took it upon myself to move <a title="Wikipedia: 'Michael Behe'" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Behe">Michael Behe</a>&#8216;s creationist book <a title="Wikipedia: 'Darwin's Black Box'" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin's_Black_Box">Darwin&#8217;s Black Box</a> out of the science section and to place it in the religion and spirituality section where it rightly belongs.</p>
<p>It turns out I am <a title="Biologists Helping Bookstores weblog" href="http://biologistshelpingbookstores.blogspot.com/">not the first to do this</a>.</p>
<p>An interesting example of convergent evolution, perhaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2007/09/20070909/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ned Flanders visits the Hall of Man</title>
		<link>http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2007/06/20070621/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2007/06/20070621/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Carter FCD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simpsons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2007/06/21/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dig at creationism, courtesy of the Simpsons team.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure this one must have done the rounds before, but I don&#8217;t remember seeing it, so what the heckerly-weckerly:</p>
<p align="center"><object width="425" height="350" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/QeqeNisXE2k" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QeqeNisXE2k" /></object></p>
<p>(More evolution-themed Simpsons nuggets <a title="YouTube: Simpsons/Evolution" href="http://youtube.com/results?search_query=simpsons+darwin">here</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2007/06/20070621/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two words on Intelligent Design</title>
		<link>http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2007/01/20070103/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2007/01/20070103/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Carter FCD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2007/01/03/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes my self-imposed ban on dignifying Intelligent Design with any sort of response can be so hard!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ga! Sometimes my <a title="Polite Note to Creationists, Religious Fundamentalists, and their Ilk" href="http://friendsofdarwin.com/articles/2001/creationists/">self-imposed ban</a> on dignifying Intelligent Design with any sort of response can be so hard!</p>
<blockquote class="cite"><p><strong>Times:</strong> <a title="Read the full article" href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFriendly/0,,1-523-2524442-523,00.html">Creationism gains foothold in schools</a></p>
<p>The [UK] government has cleared the way for a form of creationism to be taught in Britain&#8217;s schools as part of the religious syllabus.</p>
<p>Lord Adonis, an education minister, is to issue guidelines within two months for the teaching of &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; (ID), a theory being promoted by the religious right in America.</p>
<p>Until now the government has not approved the teaching of the controversial theory, which contradicts Darwinian evolutionary theory, the basis of modern biology.</p></blockquote>
<p>…so I&#8217;ll limit myself to just two words:</p>
<p><em>Arse wank!</em></p>
<p>(I hope that&#8217;s dignified enough for you.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2007/01/20070103/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When the infallible embraces the unfalsifiable</title>
		<link>http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2006/08/20060828a/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2006/08/20060828a/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Carter FCD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2006/08/28a/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pope prepares to embrace theory of intelligent design.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I promised myself I wasn&#8217;t going to waste any time getting embroiled in the evolution v creationism non-debate on this website, but&hellip;</p>
<blockquote class="cite"><p><strong>Guardian:</strong> <a title="Read the full article" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,,1859761,00.html">Pope prepares to embrace theory of intelligent design</a></p>
<p>Philosophers, scientists and other intellectuals close to Pope Benedict will gather at his summer palace outside Rome this week for intensive discussions that could herald a fundamental shift in the Vatican&#8217;s view of evolution.</p>
<p>There have been growing signs the Pope is considering aligning his church more closely with the theory of &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; taught in some US states. Advocates of the theory argue that some features of the universe and nature are so complex that they must have been designed by a higher intelligence. Critics say it is a disguise for creationism.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Just for the record, what a total tosser!</p>
<p>For more insightful comment and analysis, why not subscribe to <a title="Red Notebook RSS feed" href="http://friendsofdarwin.com/weblog/rss/">the Red Notebook RSS feed</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.friendsofdarwin.com/2006/08/20060828a/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

